ESTRAGON:
Why doesn't he
put down his bags?
POZZO:
I too would be
happy to meet him. The more people I meet the happier I become. From the
meanest creature one departs wiser, richer, more conscious of one's blessings.
Even you . . . (he looks at them ostentatiously in turn to make it clear
they are both meant) . . . even you, who knows, will have added to my
store.
ESTRAGON:
Why doesn't he
put down his bags?
POZZO:
But that would
surprise me.
VLADIMIR:
You're being
asked a question.
POZZO:
(delighted). A
question! Who? What? A moment ago you were calling me Sir, in fear and
trembling. Now you're asking me questions. No good will come of this!
VLADIMIR:
(to Estragon). I
think he's listening.
ESTRAGON:
(circling
about Lucky). What?
VLADIMIR:
You can ask him
now. He's on the alert.
ESTRAGON:
Ask him what?
VLADIMIR:
Why he doesn't
put down his bags.
ESTRAGON:
I wonder.
VLADIMIR:
Ask him, can't
you?
“Waiting for Godot” by Samuel Beckett is an allegorical play
following the lives of two men, Vladimir and Estragon. The play is set on a
desolate roadside under a tree. The two men meet under the tree and converse on
a lot of topics and it is revealed that they are waiting for a man by the name
of Godot. Vladimir and Estragon wait persistently for Godot, but he never
arrives and in the end Vladimir and Estragon leave. Beckett is successful in
creating a world of absurdism and insignificance through symbolism and a lack
of memory. The passage above fits into this pattern and this essay aims to do a
close reading of it.
The lack of memory in Waiting for Godot presents a world of
meaningless existence. In this excerpt, we see what looks to be a frustrating
exchange of words; questions are not answered and Estragon forgets a question
he just asked and needs to be reminded by Vladimir. “Vladimir: You can ask him
now. He’s on alert. Estragon: Ask him what?” Beckett is emphasizing our
purposelessness by showing how our past and futures are pointless. This could
be a critique of religion and mankind’s constant search for the meaning of
life. The religions we follow are just a distraction to the fact that we live
in a world of no significance. Our actions and conversations will be forgotten
when we die and this is represented in the annoying, pointless, cyclical
conversations in the play, as shown in the extract presented here.
Beckett also makes use of symbolism in the excerpt to
further highlight the theme of absurdism and his critique of society’s desire,
to find the meaning of life. “I too would be happy to meet him.” In this quote,
we see that Pozzo is excited about the idea of waiting for Godot too, mirroring
societies need to look forward to something that will bring their lives
meaning. Godot is a character that has never been seen by the other characters
except the messenger and is of such significance to Vladimir, Estragon and even
attracts the attention of Pozzo. Beckett uses Godot to symbolize religion. Faith
drives people to hope for something greater, the same way Vladimir, Estragon
and now Pozzo are anticipating something worthwhile from their meeting with
Godot. Beckett shows the reality of the absurdist world we live in through the
diminishing hope and falsehood the characters live in. Godot never comes and
the lives of the characters are bland and monotonous, thus showing the lack of
meaning that the world has. Godot could be urging society not to sit back their
whole lives hoping for something greater but to investigate their own meaning.
As seen from the excerpt above, Beckett successfully
presents a harsh and scary reality. Whilst many of the themes and ideas he
presents can be contested, his ability to use characters and their interactions
to support the absurdist movement is impressive. This excerpts bland and
repetitive nature, help Beckett present the absurdist world we live in, where our
existence ultimately has no meaning.
I thought this post was really well written and effective at supporting your statement that Beckett uses symbolism and forgetfulness to show the absurdism and ultimate insignificance of life. I have a question about the statement in the first body paragraph: "Beckett is emphasizing our purposelessness by showing how our past and futures are pointless," so does this also mean that our present is pointless? If you expanded this into a longer piece, I would clarify that ambiguity for the reader. Thought there's a bit of a reasoning gap when you switch to discussing religion in the first paragraph, overall it's really concise and effective, and then there is a more natural transition to religion in the second body paragraph. I think this post flowed well and I enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteI think you did a really good job of initially explaining the plot of Waiting for Godot without overdoing it. Your thesis also does a good job of clearly outlining what the post is going to be about. I agree that Godot is a symbol for God and religion in general, but I would expand on that idea more, perhaps. Also "a harsh and scary reality" is kind of a cliche, so I would avoid it for future papers.
ReplyDelete