In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” and George Orwell’s “Shooting
an Elephant,” readers are able to view the power of race and privilege. The
Southern whites and the Englishmen were the superior race during
colonization and after the civil war, they were privileged in the
things they had access to due to technology and economic growth of their
nations. Faulkner's use of diction in the word "Negro" set the time
frame of this story. As all the African Americans that were mentioned in the
story were working in helping household or service jobs, readers understand
that they were free folk after the civil war. However, they were still working
jobs that required their service as the help. "They were admitted by the old Negro into a dim hall from
which a stairway mounted into still more shadow," (Faulkner) enforces the
concept of a minority providing service as the help. Reference to Emily's lover
as a "Yankee" further supports the concept of privileged race of
the Southern whites. Faulkner's tone towards race seems to enable race as an
identifier for where people belong in the social structure. Emily, a southern
white was able to get away with not paying the taxes she needed to. It can be
argued Emily used her power, derived from her dead father, to not pay taxes.
She comes from old money even though it deteriorates with her home, as the rest
of the village has progressed into new technology. Faulkner provides this abuse of power to
further establish her race status because the help would not have been able to receive
the same treatment because they were black, a minority. Her holding back from
change represents her power over the rest of the people. Unlike in “Shooting an
Elephant,” everyone is okay with inferiority views.
Orwell
writes of a time where the Englishmen were colonizing Burma. Race still plays a
role in this short story, however, race means a sense of belonging. The
Englishman identifies himself as a foreigner in this country where people view
him as an outcast with power over them. He believes “it is the condition of his
rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the natives,” (Orwell).
He realizes the sense of power he has over them and feels guilty for
contributing to their colonization. His realization of power makes him want to
be accepted in to their culture. The only way he was able to find a sense of belonging
was through the death of the elephant. Ironically, an Englishman was able to be
part of a minorities culture unlike in “A Rose for Emily.” Race was a theme in
both stories and authors show how race can affect the way we convene with one
another. Faulkner shows the role of race
with power and money, never associating with the minority group unless you want
to be frowned upon. Where Orwell, reveals the way races can coexist together
only if common ground is made
Your blog is a great analysis of the power dynamics in "A Rose for Emily" and "Shooting an Elephant." Although you do a great analysis with the two texts, I would have provided a clear thesis that you can feed off of in following arguments. I would also analyse a bit further on the race relations in the settings of the two texts. Awesome job!
ReplyDeleteI think you presented a clear argument in your blog; I definitely agree with you in that race and privilege were the common themes that tied both texts together. Maybe you could break the first paragraph up into two paragraphs just to make your blog a bit more organized. Other than that, great job!
ReplyDelete