Blog 2 Topic 1
In William Faulkner’s “A
Rose for Emily” and George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant,” the influence of a
power dynamic is used to express the difference in race between people and
regions. In the 1800s the superior, or powerful, race in the United States were
the white men. On the other hand, the African race was looked down upon and
abused because the whites believed themselves higher than their fellow man.
When compared to “A Rose for Emily,” the townspeople constantly refer to the
term “Negro”. The only problem about the text’s use of this derogatory term is
that the racism is basically overlooked as if it was completely normal,
although the Civil War ended a few years prior to when the short story was
written. The power dynamic also played a role in a person’s public status due
to their race. For example, “They were admitted by the old Negro into a dim
hall from which a stairway mounted into still more shadow.” In this time
period, the Africans have gained their freedom but are still given low class positions.
Throughout the entire story, the African’s have a lower power status compared to
the Southern Whites in their town because they were considered to be lower
class. One example is, “THE NEGRO met the first of the ladies at the front door
and let them in.” Faulkner emphasizes the use of the word “negro” by placing it
in caps in order to show how much the southerners looked down upon the Africans.
By emphasizing the word, this shows how the Whites believed they were superior.
Unlike Orwell’s story, the white man felt as if he was a minority and the
natives were superior.
Meanwhile in the short story “To
Shoot an Elephant”, the influence of the power dynamic is switched. For
example, “secretly, of course – I was all for the Burmese and all against their
oppressors.” Orwell expresses his sympathy for the people of India for being
oppressed by the British Imperialists. Instead of Orwell feeling superior to
the natives, he instead shows sympathy because he believes their hate for the
Europeans is just. Also, throughout the story Orwell attempts to gain the
Natives’ acceptance. In contrast with “A Rose for Emily,” the Southerners did
nothing to make the Africans feel as if they were equals. Another example is,
“it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to
impress the ‘natives’.” Orwell felt that he had to kill the elephant in order
to impress the natives; whereas, Faulkner does not attempt to show any sympathy
towards Africans in his story. Faulkner’s characters ignore the fact that the
Africans are now free and are capable of choosing their own path, but are
rejected this right and instead made meaningless workers for the white people. The
power dynamic that is portrayed by Orwell also shows how he had to lose his
humanity in order to be approved by the citizens of India.
This is a great compare and contrast job. I especially like the part when you say "The only problem about the text’s use of this derogatory term is that the racism is basically overlooked as if it was completely normal." Very good point I did not think about. You could have also expanded on this point and said that this is what makes the post civil war southern society more racist than they think. I would also further analyse whether Orwell is actually a good character in the story or if he possesses double standards. Great analysis though!
ReplyDeleteYou did a really nice job in providing examples from both texts to support your argument. I liked your point about Faulkner's utilization of diction to express the superiority of whites over African Americans in "A Rose for Emily." I also thought your blog was nicely organized and very straight-to-the-point. Nice job!
ReplyDelete