Ezra Pound’s famous poem “In a Station of the Metro”
embodies the ideas of the imagist movement that was sprouting in the early
1900s. The whole poem is composed of only 14 words, similar to a haiku, yet a
quiet different style than that exhibited during the time like “The Love Song of
J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Elliot. Although the poem is concise with its word
choice and is condensed in form, Pound uses short yet powerful images of
contrasting urban life with nature to convey a message about our society.
Pound's choice in diction and form presents
a vivid picture for the reader to digest. The poem’s title, which consist of an
equal amount of words as the last line, gives the bulk of the setting of the
poem. The reader must realize that the poem is taking place in a metro station
which is associated with life in the flourishing city. The opening
statement of the two-line poem starts out with word “apparition”, which gives
the poem an ominous tone. Apparition’s refer to the appearance of something
spectacular or unexpected, usually referring to ghosts or a spirit appearing
out of nowhere. Pound’s selective diction of this phrase gives off the
impression that the faces are moving at a fast pace, quick enough that their
faces look like blurry ghosts passing through a street. Instead of describing
the faces in the crowd as hazy due to movement throughout the course of ten
lines, he condenses his thought into one precise word that opens up the reader’s
imagination. In addition, the form in the first line mimics that of a fast
paced metro station, with the rhythm similar to a chugging train. He
uses this meter and choppiness of lines to emphasize the hectic city component
that prevails in human lifestyle. This choice in diction and rhythmic allusion creates
a rich and compelling image in a direct manner.
The last line accentuates the
contrasting images that Pound is presenting between the noisy urban life and
the peacefulness of nature. He completes the portrait of the people rushing
through the metro by comparing the faces to petals on a branch. The use of
the word “petals” give the faces a purer, natural and unique feel. In addition,
petals are still very uniform in nature with most of them in the same color and
general shape. Pound could have described the people as different flowers
budding from a vast landscape but instead chooses to compare humans to similarly
structured petals. Pound also adds one color, black, to describe the tree
branch. The color black is usually associated with darkness, death and
dreariness which adds further to the ominous tone from earlier in the poem.
Pound does not voice his opinions about the world around him but instead uses the
dark branch to describe the depressing world that all the uniform petals, or
humans, are continuously passing by. The divergent structure of the poem creates
a comparison that conveys a message about society; urban and natural life are
intertwined and humans must learn to appreciate this or life will quickly slip
away.
Pound expresses the imagist manifesto
by producing a short contrasting image to articulate his grievances with
society and the booming industrial market. His technique is unique because he
does not include any verbs or comparison words to bring about the
juxtaposition. He incorporates a choppy rhythm similar to a metro passing, laconic
yet sharp diction and unique prose to express his vision. The contrast of the
blurred faces to petals on a bough emphasizes the disassociation between urban lifestyle
and pure nature that Pound wants to bring to attention in a concise and poetic
manner.
I really enjoyed your analysis. I like how you used the word apparition, then giving us the definition. Not assuming we all know what it means. You incorporated the whole poem and seeing the break down made me understand your point and made me agree with you. Very good.
ReplyDeleteYou had really interesting analysis that made me think of the poem in a way I hadn't before. My main criticism it's vague when you just say that the poem conveys a message about our society in the intro paragraph. You do explain really well the messages later on, but being more specific in the introduction would have just sharpened the build up to your later points, which are really good!
ReplyDelete